denozord/strongswan-ext
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

kernel-pfkey: Use the same priority range for trap and regular policies

Browse Source 
Same as the change in the kernel-netlink plugin.
This commit is contained in:
Tobias Brunner
2017-02-08 10:36:38 +01:00
parent 0e9d6c4605
commit 3c46ce2834
1 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
src/libcharon/plugins/kernel_pfkey/kernel_pfkey_ipsec.c
+15 -15
View File
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
#endif
/** Base priority for installed policies */
#define PRIO_BASE 100000
#define PRIO_BASE 200000
#ifdef __APPLE__
/** from xnu/bsd/net/pfkeyv2.h */
@@ -597,17 +597,18 @@ static inline bool policy_entry_match_byindex(policy_entry_t *current,
* This is the same formula we use in the kernel-netlink interface, but some
* features are currently not or only partially supported by PF_KEY.
*
* bits 0-0: reserved for interface restriction (0..1) 1 bit
* bits 1-6: src + dst port mask bits (2 * 0..16) 6 bits
* bits 7-7: restriction to protocol (0..1) 1 bit
* bits 8-16: src + dst network mask bits (2 * 0..128) 9 bits
* 17 bits
* bits 0-0: separate trap and regular policies (0..1) 1 bit
* bits 1-1: reserved for interface restriction (0..1) 1 bit
* bits 2-7: src + dst port mask bits (2 * 0..16) 6 bits
* bits 8-8: restriction to protocol (0..1) 1 bit
* bits 9-17: src + dst network mask bits (2 * 0..128) 9 bits
* 18 bits
*
* smallest value: 000000000 0 000000 0: 0, lowest priority = 100'000
* largest value : 100000000 1 100000 0: 65'728, highst priority = 34'272
* smallest value: 000000000 0 000000 0 0: 0, lowest priority = 100'000
* largest value : 100000000 1 100000 0 1: 131'457, highst priority = 68'543
*/
static inline uint32_t get_priority(policy_entry_t *policy,
policy_priority_t prio)
policy_priority_t prio)
{
uint32_t priority = PRIO_BASE;
@@ -617,8 +618,6 @@ static inline uint32_t get_priority(policy_entry_t *policy,
priority += PRIO_BASE;
/* fall-through */
case POLICY_PRIORITY_ROUTED:
priority += PRIO_BASE;
/* fall-through */
case POLICY_PRIORITY_DEFAULT:
priority += PRIO_BASE;
/* fall-through */
@@ -627,10 +626,11 @@ static inline uint32_t get_priority(policy_entry_t *policy,
}
/* calculate priority */
priority -= (policy->src.mask + policy->dst.mask) * 256;
priority -= policy->src.proto != IPSEC_PROTO_ANY ? 128 : 0;
priority -= policy->src.net->get_port(policy->src.net) ? 32 : 0;
priority -= policy->dst.net->get_port(policy->dst.net) ? 32 : 0;
priority -= (policy->src.mask + policy->dst.mask) * 512;
priority -= policy->src.proto != IPSEC_PROTO_ANY ? 256 : 0;
priority -= policy->src.net->get_port(policy->src.net) ? 64 : 0;
priority -= policy->dst.net->get_port(policy->dst.net) ? 64 : 0;
priority -= (prio != POLICY_PRIORITY_ROUTED);
return priority;
}