some typos
This commit is contained in:
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct ike_sa_manager_t {
|
||||
* Create and check out a new IKE_SA.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param initiator TRUE for initiator, FALSE otherwise
|
||||
* @returns created andchecked out IKE_SA
|
||||
* @returns created and checked out IKE_SA
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ike_sa_t* (*checkout_new) (ike_sa_manager_t* this, bool initiator);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -67,13 +67,13 @@ struct ike_sa_manager_t {
|
||||
* Checkout an IKE_SA by a message.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In some situations, it is necessary that the manager knows the
|
||||
* message to use for the checkout. This has the folloing reasons:
|
||||
* message to use for the checkout. This has the following reasons:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1. If the targeted IKE_SA is already processing a message, we do not
|
||||
* check it out if the message ID is the same.
|
||||
* 2. If it is an IKE_SA_INIT request, we have to check if it is a
|
||||
* retransmission. If so, we have to drop the message, we would
|
||||
* create another unneded IKE_SA for each retransmitted packet.
|
||||
* create another unneeded IKE_SA for each retransmitted packet.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A call to checkout_by_message() returns a (maybe new created) IKE_SA.
|
||||
* If processing the message does not make sense (for the reasons above),
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user