Merge branch 'multi-eap'
Fixes the use of EAP methods in the non-first authentication round if the initiator demands mutual EAP. Also mutual EAP can now be enforced when the initiator sets rightauth=eap, not only with rightauth=any.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -667,6 +667,16 @@ METHOD(authenticator_t, build_client, status_t,
|
||||
METHOD(authenticator_t, is_mutual, bool,
|
||||
private_eap_authenticator_t *this)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (this->method)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u_int32_t vendor;
|
||||
|
||||
if (this->method->get_type(this->method, &vendor) != EAP_IDENTITY ||
|
||||
vendor != 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return this->method->is_mutual(this->method);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* we don't know yet, but insist on it after EAP is complete */
|
||||
this->require_mutual = TRUE;
|
||||
return TRUE;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -222,6 +222,18 @@ static auth_cfg_t *get_auth_cfg(private_ike_auth_t *this, bool local)
|
||||
return next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Move the currently active auth config to the auth configs completed
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void apply_auth_cfg(private_ike_auth_t *this, bool local)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auth_cfg_t *cfg;
|
||||
|
||||
cfg = auth_cfg_create();
|
||||
cfg->merge(cfg, this->ike_sa->get_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, local), local);
|
||||
this->ike_sa->add_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, local, cfg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Check if we have should initiate another authentication round
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -307,7 +319,7 @@ static bool update_cfg_candidates(private_ike_auth_t *this, bool strict)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (this->peer_cfg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool complies = TRUE;
|
||||
char *comply_error = NULL;
|
||||
enumerator_t *e1, *e2, *tmp;
|
||||
auth_cfg_t *c1, *c2;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -324,22 +336,30 @@ static bool update_cfg_candidates(private_ike_auth_t *this, bool strict)
|
||||
while (e1->enumerate(e1, &c1))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* check if done authentications comply to configured ones */
|
||||
if ((!e2->enumerate(e2, &c2)) ||
|
||||
(!strict && !c1->complies(c1, c2, TRUE)) ||
|
||||
(strict && !c2->complies(c2, c1, TRUE)))
|
||||
if (!e2->enumerate(e2, &c2))
|
||||
{
|
||||
complies = FALSE;
|
||||
comply_error = "insufficient authentication rounds";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!strict && !c1->complies(c1, c2, TRUE))
|
||||
{
|
||||
comply_error = "non-matching authentication done";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (strict && !c2->complies(c2, c1, TRUE))
|
||||
{
|
||||
comply_error = "constraint checking failed";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
e1->destroy(e1);
|
||||
e2->destroy(e2);
|
||||
if (complies)
|
||||
if (!comply_error)
|
||||
{
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
DBG1(DBG_CFG, "selected peer config '%s' inacceptable",
|
||||
this->peer_cfg->get_name(this->peer_cfg));
|
||||
DBG1(DBG_CFG, "selected peer config '%s' inacceptable: %s",
|
||||
this->peer_cfg->get_name(this->peer_cfg), comply_error);
|
||||
this->peer_cfg->destroy(this->peer_cfg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (this->candidates->remove_first(this->candidates,
|
||||
@@ -464,10 +484,7 @@ METHOD(task_t, build_i, status_t,
|
||||
switch (this->my_auth->build(this->my_auth, message))
|
||||
{
|
||||
case SUCCESS:
|
||||
/* authentication step complete, reset authenticator */
|
||||
cfg = auth_cfg_create();
|
||||
cfg->merge(cfg, this->ike_sa->get_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, TRUE), TRUE);
|
||||
this->ike_sa->add_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, TRUE, cfg);
|
||||
apply_auth_cfg(this, TRUE);
|
||||
this->my_auth->destroy(this->my_auth);
|
||||
this->my_auth = NULL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@@ -640,10 +657,7 @@ METHOD(task_t, process_r, status_t,
|
||||
return NEED_MORE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* store authentication information */
|
||||
cfg = auth_cfg_create();
|
||||
cfg->merge(cfg, this->ike_sa->get_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, FALSE), FALSE);
|
||||
this->ike_sa->add_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, FALSE, cfg);
|
||||
apply_auth_cfg(this, FALSE);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!update_cfg_candidates(this, FALSE))
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -778,10 +792,7 @@ METHOD(task_t, build_r, status_t,
|
||||
switch (this->my_auth->build(this->my_auth, message))
|
||||
{
|
||||
case SUCCESS:
|
||||
cfg = auth_cfg_create();
|
||||
cfg->merge(cfg, this->ike_sa->get_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, TRUE),
|
||||
TRUE);
|
||||
this->ike_sa->add_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, TRUE, cfg);
|
||||
apply_auth_cfg(this, TRUE);
|
||||
this->my_auth->destroy(this->my_auth);
|
||||
this->my_auth = NULL;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@@ -969,10 +980,10 @@ METHOD(task_t, process_i, status_t,
|
||||
goto peer_auth_failed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* store authentication information, reset authenticator */
|
||||
cfg = auth_cfg_create();
|
||||
cfg->merge(cfg, this->ike_sa->get_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, FALSE), FALSE);
|
||||
this->ike_sa->add_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, FALSE, cfg);
|
||||
if (!mutual_eap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
apply_auth_cfg(this, FALSE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (this->my_auth)
|
||||
@@ -980,10 +991,11 @@ METHOD(task_t, process_i, status_t,
|
||||
switch (this->my_auth->process(this->my_auth, message))
|
||||
{
|
||||
case SUCCESS:
|
||||
cfg = auth_cfg_create();
|
||||
cfg->merge(cfg, this->ike_sa->get_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, TRUE),
|
||||
TRUE);
|
||||
this->ike_sa->add_auth_cfg(this->ike_sa, TRUE, cfg);
|
||||
apply_auth_cfg(this, TRUE);
|
||||
if (this->my_auth->is_mutual(this->my_auth))
|
||||
{
|
||||
apply_auth_cfg(this, FALSE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
this->my_auth->destroy(this->my_auth);
|
||||
this->my_auth = NULL;
|
||||
this->do_another_auth = do_another_auth(this);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user