unit-tests: Add tests for expires after CHILD_SA rekeying
This commit is contained in:
@@ -184,6 +184,133 @@ START_TEST(test_regular_ke_invalid)
|
||||
}
|
||||
END_TEST
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Check that the responder ignores soft expires while waiting for the delete
|
||||
* after a rekeying.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
START_TEST(test_regular_responder_ignore_soft_expire)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
||||
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
||||
&a, &b, NULL);
|
||||
initiate_rekey(a, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* this should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
||||
|
||||
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> */
|
||||
assert_hook_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
assert_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } */
|
||||
assert_hook_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
assert_no_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 3, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
/* we don't expect this to get called anymore */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
/* this should not produce a message, if it does there won't be a delete
|
||||
* payload below */
|
||||
call_ikesa(b, rekey_child_sa, PROTO_ESP, 2);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
|
||||
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
||||
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
||||
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
||||
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 3, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* child_rekey/child_updown */
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
||||
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
END_TEST
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Check that the responder handles hard expires properly while waiting for the
|
||||
* delete after a rekeying (e.g. if the initiator of the rekeying fails to
|
||||
* delete the CHILD_SA for some reason).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
START_TEST(test_regular_responder_handle_hard_expire)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
||||
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
||||
&a, &b, NULL);
|
||||
initiate_rekey(a, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* this should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
||||
|
||||
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> */
|
||||
assert_hook_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
assert_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } */
|
||||
assert_hook_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
assert_no_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 3, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
/* we don't expect this to get called anymore */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
/* this is similar to a regular delete collision */
|
||||
assert_single_payload(OUT, PLV2_DELETE);
|
||||
call_ikesa(b, delete_child_sa, PROTO_ESP, 2, TRUE);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
|
||||
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
||||
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
||||
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 3, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { } */
|
||||
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 3, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
||||
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* child_rekey/child_updown */
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
||||
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
END_TEST
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Both peers initiate the CHILD_SA reekying concurrently and should handle
|
||||
* the collision properly depending on the nonces.
|
||||
@@ -1411,6 +1538,8 @@ Suite *child_rekey_suite_create()
|
||||
tc = tcase_create("regular");
|
||||
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_regular, 0, 2);
|
||||
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_regular_ke_invalid, 0, 2);
|
||||
tcase_add_test(tc, test_regular_responder_ignore_soft_expire);
|
||||
tcase_add_test(tc, test_regular_responder_handle_hard_expire);
|
||||
suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
|
||||
|
||||
tc = tcase_create("collisions rekey");
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user