further work done for simultaneous rekeying/delete

still some cases which cause trouble
This commit is contained in:
Martin Willi
2006-07-10 14:24:04 +00:00
parent c5d2d7c023
commit abba7ecb9d
15 changed files with 312 additions and 229 deletions
+108 -13
View File
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
#include <encoding/payloads/sa_payload.h>
#include <encoding/payloads/nonce_payload.h>
#include <encoding/payloads/ts_payload.h>
#include <sa/child_sa.h>
#include <sa/transactions/delete_child_sa.h>
#include <utils/randomizer.h>
@@ -115,6 +114,11 @@ struct private_create_child_sa_t {
*/
child_sa_t *rekeyed_sa;
/**
* Have we lost the simultaneous rekeying nonce compare?
*/
bool lost;
/**
* source of randomness
*/
@@ -143,13 +147,22 @@ static u_int32_t requested(private_create_child_sa_t *this)
}
/**
* Implementation of transaction_t.rekeys_child.
* Implementation of create_child_sa_t.rekeys_child.
*/
static void rekeys_child(private_create_child_sa_t *this, child_sa_t *child_sa)
{
this->rekeyed_sa = child_sa;
}
/**
* Implementation of create_child_sa_t.cancel.
*/
static void cancel(private_create_child_sa_t *this)
{
this->rekeyed_sa = NULL;
this->lost = TRUE;
}
/**
* Implementation of transaction_t.get_request.
*/
@@ -158,6 +171,15 @@ static status_t get_request(private_create_child_sa_t *this, message_t **result)
message_t *request;
host_t *me, *other;
/* check if we are not already rekeying */
if (this->rekeyed_sa &&
this->rekeyed_sa->is_rekeying(this->rekeyed_sa))
{
this->logger->log(this->logger, ERROR,
"rekeying a CHILD_SA which is already rekeying, aborted");
return FAILED;
}
/* check if we already have built a message (retransmission) */
if (this->message)
{
@@ -249,8 +271,8 @@ static status_t get_request(private_create_child_sa_t *this, message_t **result)
notify->set_spi(notify, this->rekeyed_sa->get_spi(this->rekeyed_sa, TRUE));
request->add_payload(request, (payload_t*)notify);
/* and mark sa with rekeying-in-progress */
this->rekeyed_sa->set_rekeyed(this->rekeyed_sa);
/* register us as rekeying to detect multiple rekeying */
this->rekeyed_sa->set_rekeying_transaction(this->rekeyed_sa, &this->public);
}
return SUCCESS;
@@ -605,12 +627,21 @@ static status_t get_response(private_create_child_sa_t *this, message_t *request
ts_response = ts_payload_create_from_traffic_selectors(FALSE, this->tsr);
response->add_payload(response, (payload_t*)ts_response);
}
/* CHILD_SA successfully created. Now we must check if it rekeys an old one,
* and if so, mark the old as rekeyed. It will get deleted from the other
* peer. */
/* CHILD_SA successfully created. We set us as the rekeying transaction of
* this SA. If we already initiated rekeying of the same SA, we will detect
* this later in the conclude() call. */
if (this->rekeyed_sa)
{
this->rekeyed_sa->set_rekeyed(this->rekeyed_sa);
if (this->rekeyed_sa->is_rekeying(this->rekeyed_sa))
{
/* rekeying already in progress, register us, too */
this->rekeyed_sa->set_rekeying_transaction(this->rekeyed_sa, &this->public);
}
else
{
/* no rekeying in progress. mark SA as rekeyed, but not conflicted */
this->rekeyed_sa->set_rekeying_transaction(this->rekeyed_sa, NULL);
}
}
return SUCCESS;
}
@@ -628,6 +659,8 @@ static status_t conclude(private_create_child_sa_t *this, message_t *response,
ts_payload_t *tsi_payload = NULL;
ts_payload_t *tsr_payload = NULL;
status_t status;
child_sa_t *new_child = NULL;
delete_child_sa_t *delete_child_sa;
/* check message type */
if (response->get_exchange_type(response) != CREATE_CHILD_SA)
@@ -726,6 +759,7 @@ static status_t conclude(private_create_child_sa_t *this, message_t *response,
"CHILD_SA creation failed");
return FAILED;
}
new_child = this->child_sa;
if (install_child_sa(this, TRUE) != SUCCESS)
{
this->logger->log(this->logger, ERROR,
@@ -733,14 +767,73 @@ static status_t conclude(private_create_child_sa_t *this, message_t *response,
return FAILED;
}
}
/* CHILD_SA successfully created. If we have rekeyed an old one, delete it */
/* CHILD_SA successfully created. If the other peer initiated rekeying
* in the meantime, we detect this by comparing the rekeying_transaction
* of the SA. If it changed, we are not alone. Then we must compare the nonces.
* If no simultaneous rekeying is going on, we just initiate the delete of
* the superseded SA. */
if (this->rekeyed_sa)
{
delete_child_sa_t *delete_child_sa;
private_create_child_sa_t *other;
delete_child_sa = delete_child_sa_create(this->ike_sa,
this->message_id + 1);
delete_child_sa->set_child_sa(delete_child_sa, this->rekeyed_sa);
other = (private_create_child_sa_t*)
this->rekeyed_sa->get_rekeying_transaction(this->rekeyed_sa);
/* we are not rekeying anymore, unregister us */
this->rekeyed_sa->set_rekeying_transaction(this->rekeyed_sa, NULL);
if (other != this)
{ /* simlutaneous rekeying is going on, not so good */
chunk_t this_lowest, other_lowest;
/* check if this has a lower nonce the other */
if (memcmp(this->nonce_i.ptr, this->nonce_r.ptr,
min(this->nonce_i.len, this->nonce_r.len)) < 0)
{
this_lowest = this->nonce_i;
}
else
{
this_lowest = this->nonce_r;
}
if (memcmp(other->nonce_i.ptr, other->nonce_r.ptr,
min(other->nonce_i.len, other->nonce_r.len)) < 0)
{
other_lowest = other->nonce_i;
}
else
{
other_lowest = other->nonce_r;
}
if (memcmp(this_lowest.ptr, other_lowest.ptr,
min(this_lowest.len, other_lowest.len)) < 0)
{
this->logger->log(this->logger, ERROR,
"detected simultaneous CHILD_SA rekeying, but ours is preferred");
}
else
{
this->logger->log(this->logger, ERROR,
"detected simultaneous CHILD_SA rekeying, deleting ours");
this->lost = TRUE;
}
}
/* delete the old SA if we have won the rekeying nonce compare*/
if (!this->lost)
{
other->rekeyed_sa->set_rekeying_transaction(other->rekeyed_sa, NULL);
delete_child_sa = delete_child_sa_create(this->ike_sa, this->message_id + 1);
delete_child_sa->set_child_sa(delete_child_sa, this->rekeyed_sa);
*next = (transaction_t*)delete_child_sa;
}
}
if (this->lost)
{
/* we have lost simlutaneous rekeying, delete the CHILD_SA we just have created */
delete_child_sa = delete_child_sa_create(this->ike_sa, this->message_id + 1);
new_child->set_rekeying_transaction(new_child, NULL);
delete_child_sa->set_child_sa(delete_child_sa, new_child);
*next = (transaction_t*)delete_child_sa;
}
return SUCCESS;
@@ -788,6 +881,7 @@ create_child_sa_t *create_child_sa_create(ike_sa_t *ike_sa, u_int32_t message_id
/* public functions */
this->public.rekeys_child = (void(*)(create_child_sa_t*,child_sa_t*))rekeys_child;
this->public.cancel = (void(*)(create_child_sa_t*))cancel;
/* private data */
this->ike_sa = ike_sa;
@@ -799,6 +893,7 @@ create_child_sa_t *create_child_sa_create(ike_sa_t *ike_sa, u_int32_t message_id
this->nonce_r = CHUNK_INITIALIZER;
this->child_sa = NULL;
this->rekeyed_sa = NULL;
this->lost = FALSE;
this->proposal = NULL;
this->tsi = NULL;
this->tsr = NULL;
+32 -4
View File
@@ -20,9 +20,8 @@
* for more details.
*/
#ifndef CREATE_CHILD_SA_
#define CREATE_CHILD_SA_
#ifndef CREATE_CHILD_SA_H_
#define CREATE_CHILD_SA_H_
#include <sa/ike_sa.h>
#include <sa/child_sa.h>
@@ -37,6 +36,23 @@ typedef struct create_child_sa_t create_child_sa_t;
* Rekeying of an CHILD_SA works the same way as creating a new one,
* but includes an additional REKEY_SA notify and deletes the old
* one (in a separate transaction).
*
* ¦__________ _________¦
* ¦ Cyq \/ Czq ¦
* ¦__________/\_________¦
* detect ¦__________ _________¦ detect
* ¦ Czp \/ Czp ¦
* compare nonces, won ¦__________/\_________¦ compare nonces, lost
* ¦ ¦
* delete old ¦__________ ¦
* ¦ Dxq \__________¦
* ¦ __________¦
* ¦__________/ Dxp ¦
* ¦ __________¦ delete created
* ¦__________/ Dzq ¦
* ¦__________ ¦
* ¦ Dzp \__________¦
*
*
* @b Constructors:
* - create_child_sa_create()
@@ -61,6 +77,18 @@ struct create_child_sa_t {
* @param child_sa CHILD_SA to rekey
*/
void (*rekeys_child) (create_child_sa_t* this, child_sa_t *child_sa);
/**
* @brief Cancel a rekeying request.
*
* Cancelling a rekeying request will set a flag in the transaction. When
* the response for the transaction is received, the created CHILD_SA
* gets deleted afterwards.
*
* @param this calling object
* @param child_sa CHILD_SA to rekey
*/
void (*cancel) (create_child_sa_t* this);
};
/**
@@ -74,4 +102,4 @@ struct create_child_sa_t {
*/
create_child_sa_t *create_child_sa_create(ike_sa_t *ike_sa, u_int32_t message_id);
#endif /* CREATE_CHILD_SA_ */
#endif /* CREATE_CHILD_SA_H_ */
+17 -2
View File
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <daemon.h>
#include <encoding/payloads/delete_payload.h>
#include <sa/transactions/create_child_sa.h>
typedef struct private_delete_child_sa_t private_delete_child_sa_t;
@@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ static status_t process_delete(private_delete_child_sa_t *this, delete_payload_t
protocol_id_t protocol;
u_int32_t spi;
iterator_t *iterator;
delete_payload_t *delete_response;
delete_payload_t *delete_response = NULL;
/* get requested CHILD */
protocol = delete_request->get_protocol_id(delete_request);
@@ -178,9 +179,23 @@ static status_t process_delete(private_delete_child_sa_t *this, delete_payload_t
if (child_sa != NULL)
{
create_child_sa_t *rekey;
this->logger->log(this->logger, CONTROL,
"received DELETE for %s CHILD_SA with SPI 0x%x, deleting",
"received DELETE for %s CHILD_SA with SPI 0x%x, deleting",
mapping_find(protocol_id_m, protocol), ntohl(spi));
rekey = child_sa->get_rekeying_transaction(child_sa);
if (rekey)
{
/* we have received a delete for an SA which we are still rekeying.
* this means we have lost the nonce comparison, and the rekeying
* will fail. We set a flag in the transaction for this special case.
*/
this->logger->log(this->logger, CONTROL,
"DELETE received while rekeying, rekeying cancelled");
rekey->cancel(rekey);
}
/* delete it, with inbound spi */
spi = child_sa->get_spi(child_sa, TRUE);
this->ike_sa->destroy_child_sa(this->ike_sa, protocol, spi);
+3 -1
View File
@@ -23,12 +23,14 @@
#ifndef TRANSACTION_H_
#define TRANSACTION_H_
typedef struct transaction_t transaction_t;
#include <types.h>
#include <encoding/message.h>
#include <sa/ike_sa.h>
typedef struct transaction_t transaction_t;
/**
* @brief This interface represents a transaction an established IKE_SA can do.