This allows re-connecting to a new session in a disconnect listener and
continue listening without having to return from listen(). The exception
can also be used to stop listening after some condition (e.g. to wait
until a specific SA got created and then stop).
When sending a TS_UNACCEPTABLE notify, a ALERT_TS_MISMATCH is sent, but
not when receiving one. This seems inconsistent compared to proposal
mismatch handling, so extend the child_create task to raise such an alert.
The bus alert infrastructure is currently exposed through the error-notify
plugin using a dedicated socket using a rather archaic message format.
Vici clients would need a dedicated socket connection just to receive such
alert messages, making their implementation more complex.
With vici, it is rather trivial to expose bus alerts through a dedicated
event message that vici clients may subscribe to. Add such an "alert"
event type to vici. Alert names are mapped to strings for simple consumption by
clients.
For now, the error-notify string message is omitted from events, as it mostly
contains static information without much value; instead add the IKE_SA details
for alerts associated to an IKE_SA. Other alert specific data may be added in
the future if needed; preferably using a structured format instead of the
arbitrary string messages used by error-notify. To allow future extensions,
wrap IKE_SA details under a dedicated "ike-sa" property.
If an entry is added while we wait for a checked out SA in flush() (e.g.
due to an action performed by that SA), new entries might get inserted
before the one we wait for. If that was the first entry in the row, we
didn't correctly update the table and the new entries were basically lost
by overwriting the first entry in the row. As the SA count was still
increased but the new entries couldn't get enumerated, the daemon wasn't
terminated properly but was stuck in the loop in flush().
Was apparently forgotten when support was added to the attr plugin
with 98a3ba8a5a ("attr: Add p-cscf keyword for P-CSCF server addresses").
For consistency, using an underscore like the `split*` options and not a
dash like in the attr plugin.
References strongswan/strongswan#2396
Apparently, some clients (e.g. native Android) just send an empty
EAP-Identity response. We silently ignored that previously and then
used the IKE identity for the actual EAP method. This change tries to
do something similar (i.e. don't fail if the response is empty), but by
assuming the IKE identity as EAP-Identity, we match that and possibly
can switch configs.
Closesstrongswan/strongswan#2833
Fixes: 2f2e4abe3c ("ikev2: Add support to switch peer configs based on EAP-Identities")
This now adds some state (basically a message buffer), but simplifies
error handling as we don't have to handle two potential failure paths
and could avoid some potential issues by still calling the blocking
read_all().
It also fixes a memory leak when clients disconnect.
Performing a stream read_all call (which is a blocking read) from
within the accept callback has the issue that if a whitelist client is
still connected whilst a shutdown of the charon deamon is triggered
then that shutdown won't complete gracefully due to the accept task
never exiting.
So fix shutting down gracefully by using the socket watcher rather than
a blocking read upon connection accept. Fall back to a blocking read
for partial messages to avoid the complexity associated (i.e. storing
state) for incomplete reads, which shouldn't block and cause the
original problem if the client only sends whole messages.
As we set the remote port to 0, we'd get a mapping change message with
every packet. Setting the threshold avoids all kernel messages after the
first, which we suppress explicitly as well.
This might make debugging easier and also ensures that a possible
fallback SA without CPU ID is established first when reestablishing
an IKE_SA. Because even if such an SA is established first initially,
that might change later depending on when per-CPU SAs are rekeyed.
Not sure if this combination does make sense as the plugin itself would
be a major bottleneck.
Similar to the connmark plugin, PREROUTING rules list SPIs or UDP ports,
which would be necessary for all SAs while the OUTPUT rules would only be
required once.
The combination probably doesn't make much sense.
The OUTPUT rules would definitely only be required once, while the INPUT
and PREROUTING rules list individual SPIs and/or UDP ports, which would
be necessary for all SAs.
By the way, the rules in PREROUTING might actually not be necessary
anymore if the set_mark_in option was used for such SAs.
Tobias Brunner