The peer might not have seen the CREATE_CHILD_SA response yet, receiving a
DELETE for the SA could then trigger it to abort the rekeying, causing
the deletion of the newly established SA (it can't know whether the
DELETE was sent due to an expire or because the user manually deleted
it). We just treat this SA as if we received a DELETE for it. This is
not an ideal situation anyway, as it causes some traffic to get dropped,
so it should usually be avoided by setting appropriate soft and hard limits.
References #2815.
If a lot of QUICK_MODE tasks are queued and the other side
sends a DPD request, there is a good chance for timeouts.
Observed this in cases where other side is quite slow in responding
QUICK_MODE requests (e.g. Cisco ASA v8.x) and about 100 CHILD_SAs
are to be spawned.
Closesstrongswan/strongswan#115.
The task manager for IKEv1 issues a retransmit send alert in the
retransmit_packet() function. The corresponding retransmit cleared alert
however is only issued for exchanges we initiated after processing the
response in process_response().
For quick mode exchanges we may retransmit the second packet if the peer
(the initiator) does not send the third message in a timely manner. In
this case the retransmit send alert may never be cleared.
With this patch the retransmit cleared alert is issued for packets that
were retransmitted also when we are the responding party when we receive
the outstanding response.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Egerer <[email protected]>
For inbound processing, it can be rather useful to apply the mark to the
packet in the SA, so the associated policy with that mark implicitly matches.
When using %unique as match mark, we don't know the mark beforehand, so
we most likely want to set the mark we match against.
We don't retransmit DPD requests like we do requests for proper exchanges,
so increasing the number with each sent DPD could result in the peer's state
getting out of sync if DPDs are lost. Because according to RFC 3706, DPDs
with an unexpected sequence number SHOULD be rejected (it does mention the
possibility of maintaining a window of acceptable numbers, but we currently
don't implement that). We partially ignore such messages (i.e. we don't
update the expected sequence number and the inbound message stats, so we
might send a DPD when none is required). However, we always send a response,
so a peer won't really notice this (it also ensures a reply for "retransmits"
caused by this change, i.e. multiple DPDs with the same number - hopefully,
other implementations behave similarly when receiving such messages).
Fixes#2714.
This is mainly for HA where a passive SA was already created when the
IKE keys were derived. If e.g. an authentication error occurs later that
SA wouldn't get cleaned up.
The options control whether the DF and ECN header bits/fields are copied
from the unencrypted packets to the encrypted packets in tunnel mode (DF only
for IPv4), and for ECN whether the same is done for inbound packets.
Note: This implementation only works with Linux/Netlink/XFRM.
Based on a patch by Markus Sattler.
Removing and readding the entry to a potentially different row/segment,
while driving out waiting and new threads, could prevent threads from
acquiring the SA even if they were waiting to check it out by unique
ID (which doesn't change), or if they were just trying to enumerate it.
With this change the row and segment doesn't change anymore and waiting
threads may acquire the SA. However, those looking for an IKE_SA by SPIs
might get one back that has a different SPI (but that's probably not
something that happens very often this early).
This was noticed because we check out SAs by unique ID in the Android
app to terminate them after failed retransmits if we are not reestablishing
the SA (otherwise we continue), and this sometimes failed.
Fixes: eaedcf8c00 ("ike-sa-manager: Add method to change the initiator SPI of an IKE_SA")
Although being already logged on level 2, these messages are usually just
confusing if they pop up randomly in the log when e.g. querying the configs
or installing traps. So after this the log messages will only be logged when
actually proposing or selecting traffic selectors during IKE.
This way we don't rely on the order of equally matching configs as
heavily anymore (which is actually tricky in vici) and this also doesn't
require repeating weak algorithms in all configs that might potentially be
selected if there are some clients that require them.
There is currently no ordering, so an explicitly configured exactly matching
proposal isn't a better match than e.g. the default proposal that also
contains the proposed algorithms.
In some scenarios we might find multiple usable peer configs with different
IKE proposals. This is a problem if we use a config with non-matching
proposals that later causes IKE rekeying to fail. It might even be a problem
already when creating the CHILD_SA if the proposals of IKE and CHILD_SA
are consistent.
This allows switching to probing mode if the client is on a public IP
and this is the active task and connectivity gets restored. We only add
NAT-D payloads if we are currently behind a NAT (to detect changed NAT
mappings), a MOBIKE update that might follow will add them in case we
move behind a NAT.
In case the PRF's set_key() or allocate_bytes() method failed, skeyseed
was not initialized and the chunk_clear() call later caused a crash.
This could have happened with OpenSSL in FIPS mode when MD5 was
negotiated (and test vectors were not checked, in which case the PRF
couldn't be instantiated as the test vectors would have failed).
MD5 is not included in the default proposal anymore since 5.6.1, so
with recent versions this could only happen with configs that are not
valid in FIPS mode anyway.
Fixes: CVE-2018-10811
Tobias Brunner