The pattern currently is to call get_cache(), generate the encoding
if that failed and then store it with cache(). The latter adopts the
passed encoding and frees any stored encoding. However, the latter means
that if two threads concurrently fail to get a cached encoding and then
both generate and store one, one of the threads might use an encoding
that was freed by the other thread.
Since encodings are not expected to change, we can avoid this issue by
not replacing an existing cache entry and instead return that (while
freeing the passed value instead of the cached one).
Closesstrongswan/strongswan#1231
Tobias Brunner