Otherwise fragmented CREATE_CHILD_SA exchanges won't get accepted
because they don't contain an SA payload.
It also prevents a warning when ordering payloads.
Fixes#752.
When invoking /bin/sh, its default PATH is used. On some systems, that does
not include the PATH where the ipsec script is installed, as charon is invoked
with a custom PATH. Explicitly setting the PATH of charon should fix this
case, properly invoking the (default) updown script.
Fixes#745.
We assume that a responder is behind a static NAT (e.g. port forwarding)
and allow remote address updates in such situations.
The problem described in RFC 5996 is only an issue if the NAT mapping
can expire.
As we want to avoid the libstrongswan include dependencies for libvici, avoid
the use of the bool type. Unfortunately this change may break the ABI for
vici_dump(). As this function is mostly for debugging purposes, we do it
nonetheless; my apologies if somebody already relies on the ABI stability of
that function.
I still think ipsec/l2tp with fragmentation support is a useful
fallback option in case the Windows IKEv2 connection fails because
of fragmentation problems.
Tested with Windows XP, 7 and 8.1.
Any interval returned by the RADIUS server in the Access-Accept message
overrides the configured interval. But it might be useful if RADIUS is
only used for accounting.
The maximum for IKEv1 is already 255 due to the 8-bit fragment number.
With an overhead of 17 bytes (x64) per fragment and a default maximum
of 10000 bytes per packet the maximum memory required is 14 kB
for a fragmented message.
For instance, if a DPD exchange is initiated by the gateway when a
mobile client is roaming and it then gets a new IP address and sends
an address update via MOBIKE, the DPD retransmits would still be sent
to the old address and the SA would eventually get closed.
The message() hook on bus_t is now called exactly once before (plain) and
once after fragmenting (!plain), not twice for the complete message and again
for each individual fragment, as was the case in earlier iterations.
For inbound messages the hook is called once for each fragment (!plain)
and twice for the reassembled message.
At the time we reset an IKE_SA (e.g. when re-authenticating a not yet
established SA due to a roaming event) such tasks might already be queued
by one of the phase 1 tasks. If the SA is initiated again another task will
get queued by the phase 1 task. This results in e.g. multiple mode config
requests, which most gateways will have problems with.
This reverts commit 3293d14628.
The position of tasks in the queue does not actually determine the order
in which they are activated. Instead this is determined by the
statements in task_manager_v2_t.initiate().
Tobias Brunner