1487 lines
50 KiB
C
1487 lines
50 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2016 Tobias Brunner
|
|
* HSR Hochschule fuer Technik Rapperswil
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
|
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
|
|
* Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
|
|
* option) any later version. See <http://www.fsf.org/copyleft/gpl.txt>.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
|
|
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY
|
|
* or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
|
* for more details.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include "test_suite.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <tests/utils/exchange_test_helper.h>
|
|
#include <tests/utils/exchange_test_asserts.h>
|
|
#include <tests/utils/job_asserts.h>
|
|
#include <tests/utils/sa_asserts.h>
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Initiate rekeying the given IKE_SA.
|
|
*/
|
|
#define initiate_rekey(sa) ({ \
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey); \
|
|
call_ikesa(sa, rekey); \
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING); \
|
|
assert_hook(); \
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Regular IKE_SA rekeying either initiated by the original initiator or
|
|
* responder of the IKE_SA.
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_regular)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *new_sa;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
if (_i)
|
|
{ /* responder rekeys the IKE_SA */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&b, &a, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{ /* initiator rekeys the IKE_SA */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 3);
|
|
assert_no_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
new_sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(3, 4, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(new_sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(new_sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(1);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 3);
|
|
assert_no_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 0);
|
|
new_sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(3, 4, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(new_sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(new_sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { } */
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
|
|
/* ike_rekey/ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* IKE_SA rekeying where the responder does not agree with the DH group selected
|
|
* by the initiator, either initiated by the original initiator or responder of
|
|
* the IKE_SA.
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_regular_ke_invalid)
|
|
{
|
|
exchange_test_sa_conf_t conf = {
|
|
.initiator = {
|
|
.ike = "aes128-sha256-modp2048-modp3072",
|
|
},
|
|
.responder = {
|
|
.ike = "aes128-sha256-modp3072-modp2048",
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_configured_proposals",
|
|
FALSE, lib->ns);
|
|
if (_i)
|
|
{ /* responder rekeys the IKE_SA */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&b, &a, &conf);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{ /* initiator rekeys the IKE_SA */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, &conf);
|
|
}
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_configured_proposals",
|
|
TRUE, lib->ns);
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_previous_dh_group",
|
|
FALSE, lib->ns);
|
|
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(INVAL_KE) } */
|
|
assert_single_notify(IN, INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 3);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(3, 5, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(1);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 3);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(3, 5, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { } */
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
|
|
/* ike_rekey/ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Both peers initiate the IKE_SA rekeying concurrently and should handle the
|
|
* collision properly depending on the nonces.
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa;
|
|
status_t status;
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
|
|
/* When rekeyings collide we get two IKE_SAs with a total of four nonces.
|
|
* The IKE_SA with the lowest nonce SHOULD be deleted by the peer that
|
|
* created that IKE_SA. The replaced IKE_SA is deleted by the peer that
|
|
* initiated the surviving SA.
|
|
* Four nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
|
* IKE_SA):
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
|
* \--/-----> N3/5
|
|
* N4/6 <-------/ /----- ...
|
|
* ... -----\
|
|
* We test this four times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct {
|
|
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
|
u_char nonces[4];
|
|
/* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */
|
|
uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r;
|
|
uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r;
|
|
/* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */
|
|
uint32_t spi_i, spi_r;
|
|
} data[] = {
|
|
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
};
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
initiate_rekey(b);
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[3];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* simplify next steps by checking in original IKE_SAs */
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin(charon->ike_sa_manager, a);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin(charon->ike_sa_manager, b);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_i);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
/* as original initiator a is initiator of both SAs it could delete */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
/* if b won it will delete the original SA a initiated */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i == 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].spi_i, data[_i].spi_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_a_i == 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(4);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_i);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
/* if b wins it deletes the SA originally initiated by a */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i != 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
/* a only deletes SAs for which b is responder */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].spi_i, data[_i].spi_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i == 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(6);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, FALSE);
|
|
status = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, status);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(5);
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i == 1);
|
|
status = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, status);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(4);
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { } */
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, TRUE);
|
|
status = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, status);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(3);
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i != 1);
|
|
status = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, status);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
|
|
/* ike_rekey/ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Both peers initiate the IKE_SA rekeying concurrently but the proposed DH
|
|
* groups are not the same. After handling the INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD they should
|
|
* still handle the collision properly depending on the nonces.
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_ke_invalid)
|
|
{
|
|
exchange_test_sa_conf_t conf = {
|
|
.initiator = {
|
|
.ike = "aes128-sha256-modp2048-modp3072",
|
|
},
|
|
.responder = {
|
|
.ike = "aes128-sha256-modp3072-modp2048",
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa;
|
|
status_t status;
|
|
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_configured_proposals",
|
|
FALSE, lib->ns);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, &conf);
|
|
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_configured_proposals",
|
|
TRUE, lib->ns);
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_previous_dh_group",
|
|
FALSE, lib->ns);
|
|
|
|
/* Six nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
|
* IKE_SA):
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
|
* \--/-----> N3/5
|
|
* N4/6 <-------/ /---- INVAL_KE
|
|
* INVAL_KE -----\ /
|
|
* <-----\--/
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ \------->
|
|
* \ /---- N2/4
|
|
* \--/----> N5/7
|
|
* N6/8 <--------/ /---- ...
|
|
* ... ------\
|
|
* We test this four times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct {
|
|
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
|
u_char nonces[4];
|
|
/* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */
|
|
uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r;
|
|
uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r;
|
|
/* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */
|
|
uint32_t spi_i, spi_r;
|
|
} data[] = {
|
|
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 7, 1, 2, 4, 8 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 8, 3, 7 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 3, 7, 1, 2, 4, 8 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 1, 2, 4, 8, 3, 7 },
|
|
};
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
initiate_rekey(b);
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[3];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(INVAL_KE) } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
assert_single_notify(IN, INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(INVAL_KE) } --> */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
|
assert_single_notify(IN, INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[3];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* simplify next steps by checking in original IKE_SAs */
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin(charon->ike_sa_manager, a);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin(charon->ike_sa_manager, b);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_i);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
/* as original initiator a is initiator of both SAs it could delete */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
/* if b won it will delete the original SA a initiated */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i == 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].spi_i, data[_i].spi_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_a_i == 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(4);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_i);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
/* if b wins it deletes the SA originally initiated by a */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i != 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
/* a only deletes SAs for which b is responder */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].spi_i, data[_i].spi_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i == 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(6);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, FALSE);
|
|
status = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, status);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(5);
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i == 1);
|
|
status = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, status);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(4);
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { } */
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, TRUE);
|
|
status = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, status);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(3);
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i != 1);
|
|
status = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, status);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
|
|
/* ike_rekey/ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* This is like the collision above but one of the retries is delayed.
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_ke_invalid_delayed_retry)
|
|
{
|
|
exchange_test_sa_conf_t conf = {
|
|
.initiator = {
|
|
.ike = "aes128-sha256-modp2048-modp3072",
|
|
},
|
|
.responder = {
|
|
.ike = "aes128-sha256-modp3072-modp2048",
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa;
|
|
message_t *msg;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_configured_proposals",
|
|
FALSE, lib->ns);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, &conf);
|
|
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_configured_proposals",
|
|
TRUE, lib->ns);
|
|
lib->settings->set_bool(lib->settings, "%s.prefer_previous_dh_group",
|
|
FALSE, lib->ns);
|
|
|
|
/* Five nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
|
* IKE_SA):
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
|
* \--/-----> N3/5
|
|
* N4/6 <-------/ /---- INVAL_KE
|
|
* INVAL_KE -----\ /
|
|
* <-----\--/
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ \------->
|
|
* <-----\--------- N2/4
|
|
* N5/7 -------\------->
|
|
* <-------\------- DELETE
|
|
* ... ------\ \----->
|
|
* /---- TEMP_FAIL
|
|
*
|
|
* We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct {
|
|
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
|
u_char nonces[3];
|
|
} data[] = {
|
|
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF } },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF } },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 } },
|
|
};
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
initiate_rekey(b);
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(INVAL_KE) } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
assert_single_notify(IN, INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(INVAL_KE) } --> */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
|
assert_single_notify(IN, INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 7, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(1);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> (delayed) */
|
|
assert_single_notify(OUT, TEMPORARY_FAILURE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, msg);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 7, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(TEMP_FAIL) } */
|
|
/* the SA is already gone */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
msg->destroy(msg);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* This is like the rekey collision above, but one peer deletes the
|
|
* redundant/old SA before the other peer receives the CREATE_CHILD_SA
|
|
* response:
|
|
* Peer A Peer B
|
|
* rekey ----\ /---- rekey
|
|
* \-----/----> detect collision
|
|
* detect collision <---------/ /----
|
|
* -----------/---->
|
|
* handle delete <---------/------ delete redundant/old SA
|
|
* ---------/------>
|
|
* handle rekey <-------/
|
|
* delete SA ---------------->
|
|
* <----------------
|
|
*
|
|
* If peer B won the collision it deletes the old IKE_SA, in which case
|
|
* this situation is handled as if peer B was not aware of the collision (see
|
|
* below). That is, peer A finalizes the rekeying initiated by the peer and
|
|
* deletes the IKE_SA (it has no way of knowing whether the peer was aware of
|
|
* the collision or not). Peer B will expect the redundant IKE_SA to get
|
|
* deleted, but that will never happen if the response arrives after the SA is
|
|
* already gone. So a job should be queued that deletes it after a while.
|
|
*
|
|
* If peer B lost it will switch to the new IKE_SA and delete the redundant
|
|
* IKE_SA and expect a delete for the old IKE_SA. In this case peer A will
|
|
* simply retransmit until it receives a response to the rekey request, all the
|
|
* while ignoring the delete requests for the unknown IKE_SA. Afterwards,
|
|
* everything works as in a regular collision (however, until peer A receives
|
|
* the response it will not be able to receive any messages on the new IKE_SA).
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_delayed_response)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa;
|
|
message_t *msg, *d;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
|
|
/* Four nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
|
* IKE_SA):
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
|
* \--/-----> N3/5
|
|
* N4/6 <-------/ /----- ...
|
|
* ... -----\
|
|
* We test this four times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct {
|
|
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
|
u_char nonces[4];
|
|
/* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */
|
|
uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r;
|
|
uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r;
|
|
/* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */
|
|
uint32_t spi_i, spi_r;
|
|
} data[] = {
|
|
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
};
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
initiate_rekey(b);
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[3];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA response from b to a */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
|
|
/* simplify next steps by checking in original IKE_SAs */
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin(charon->ike_sa_manager, a);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin(charon->ike_sa_manager, b);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_i);
|
|
/* besides the job that retransmits the delete, we expect a job that
|
|
* deletes the redundant IKE_SA if we expect the other to delete it */
|
|
assert_jobs_scheduled(data[_i].del_b_i == 1 ? 2 : 1);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
/* if b wins it deletes the SA originally initiated by a */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i != 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
/* a only deletes SAs for which b is responder */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].spi_i, data[_i].spi_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_b_i == 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(4);
|
|
assert_scheduler();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
if (data[_i].del_b_i == 1)
|
|
{ /* b won, it deletes the replaced IKE_SA */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_i);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, a);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].spi_i, data[_i].spi_r, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(4);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, b);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(3);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
/* the job will later remove this redundant IKE_SA on b */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_sa_idle(sa);
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } (delayed) */
|
|
/* the IKE_SA (a) does not exist anymore */
|
|
msg->destroy(msg);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{ /* b lost, the delete is for the non-existing redundant IKE_SA */
|
|
d = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, KEr } (delayed) */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_i);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, msg);
|
|
/* as original initiator a is initiator of both SAs it could delete */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
/* this is the redundant SA b is trying to delete */
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].spi_i, data[_i].spi_r,
|
|
data[_i].del_a_i == 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(6);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, FALSE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(5);
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { } */
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_a_i, data[_i].del_a_r, TRUE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(4);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } (retransmit/delayed) */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r, FALSE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa, d);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(3);
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(data[_i].del_b_i, data[_i].del_b_r, TRUE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, sa,
|
|
NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->checkin_and_destroy(charon->ike_sa_manager, sa);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
/* ike_rekey */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* In this scenario one of the peers does not notice that there is a rekey
|
|
* collision because the other request is dropped:
|
|
*
|
|
* rekey ----\ /---- rekey
|
|
* \ /
|
|
* detect collision <-----\---/
|
|
* -------\-------->
|
|
* detect collision <-------\-------- delete old SA
|
|
* delete ---------\------>
|
|
* rekey done \-----> SA not found (or it never arrives)
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_dropped_request)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa;
|
|
message_t *msg;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
|
|
/* Three nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
|
* CHILD_SA):
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
|
* N3/5 <-----\--/
|
|
* ... -----\ \-------> ...
|
|
* We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct {
|
|
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
|
u_char nonces[3];
|
|
/* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */
|
|
uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r;
|
|
uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r;
|
|
/* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */
|
|
uint32_t spi_i, spi_r;
|
|
} data[] = {
|
|
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
};
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
/* drop the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
msg->destroy(msg);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
initiate_rekey(b);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(1);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* In this scenario one of the peers does not notice that there is a rekey
|
|
* collision because the other request is delayed:
|
|
*
|
|
* rekey ----\ /---- rekey
|
|
* \ /
|
|
* detect collision <-----\---/
|
|
* -------\-------->
|
|
* \ /---- delete old SA
|
|
* \-/----> detect collision
|
|
* detect collision <---------/ /---- TEMP_FAIL
|
|
* delete -----------/---->
|
|
* rekey done /
|
|
* sa already gone <--------/
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_delayed_request)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa;
|
|
message_t *msg;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
|
|
/* Three nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
|
* CHILD_SA):
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
|
* N3/5 <-----\--/
|
|
* ... -----\ \-------> ...
|
|
* We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct {
|
|
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
|
u_char nonces[3];
|
|
/* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */
|
|
uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r;
|
|
uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r;
|
|
/* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */
|
|
uint32_t spi_i, spi_r;
|
|
} data[] = {
|
|
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
};
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
initiate_rekey(b);
|
|
|
|
/* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(1);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> (delayed) */
|
|
assert_single_notify(OUT, TEMPORARY_FAILURE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, msg);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(TEMP_FAIL) } */
|
|
/* the SA is already gone */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
msg->destroy(msg);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* In this scenario one of the peers does not notice that there is a rekey
|
|
* collision and the delete arrives after the TEMPORARY_FAILURE notify:
|
|
*
|
|
* rekey ----\ /---- rekey
|
|
* \ /
|
|
* detect collision <-----\---/
|
|
* -------\-------->
|
|
* \ /---- delete old SA
|
|
* \-/----> detect collision
|
|
* no reschedule <---------/------ TEMP_FAIL
|
|
* detect collision <--------/
|
|
* delete ---------------->
|
|
* rekey done
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_delayed_request_and_delete)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b, *sa;
|
|
message_t *msg;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
|
|
/* Three nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
|
* CHILD_SA):
|
|
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
|
* N3/5 <-----\--/
|
|
* ... -----\ \-------> ...
|
|
* We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
|
*/
|
|
struct {
|
|
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
|
u_char nonces[3];
|
|
/* SPIs of the deleted IKE_SAs (either redundant or replaced) */
|
|
uint32_t del_a_i, del_a_r;
|
|
uint32_t del_b_i, del_b_r;
|
|
/* SPIs of the kept IKE_SA */
|
|
uint32_t spi_i, spi_r;
|
|
} data[] = {
|
|
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 3, 5, 1, 2, 4, 6 },
|
|
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 5 },
|
|
};
|
|
/* these should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
|
initiate_rekey(b);
|
|
|
|
/* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(b, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, TRUE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(1);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> (delayed) */
|
|
assert_single_notify(OUT, TEMPORARY_FAILURE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, msg);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
|
|
/* delay the INFORMATIONAL request from b to a */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(TEMP_FAIL) } */
|
|
assert_hook_rekey(ike_rekey, 1, 4);
|
|
assert_no_jobs_scheduled();
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_REKEYED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(a, 0);
|
|
sa = assert_ike_sa_checkout(4, 5, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(sa, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_child_sa_count(sa, 1);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(2);
|
|
assert_scheduler();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } (delayed) */
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, msg);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
assert_message_empty(IN);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* ike_updown/child_updown */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
charon->ike_sa_manager->flush(charon->ike_sa_manager);
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* One of the hosts initiates a DELETE of the IKE_SA the other peer is
|
|
* concurrently trying to rekey.
|
|
*
|
|
* rekey ----\ /---- delete
|
|
* \-----/----> detect collision
|
|
* detect collision <---------/ /---- TEMP_FAIL
|
|
* delete ----\ /
|
|
* \----/----->
|
|
* sa already gone <--------/
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_delete)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
|
message_t *msg;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
if (_i)
|
|
{ /* responder rekeys the IKE_SA */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&b, &a, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{ /* initiator rekeys the IKE_SA */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
/* this should never get called as this does not result in a successful
|
|
* rekeying on either side */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, delete, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
|
|
/* RFC 7296, 2.25.2: If a peer receives a request to rekey an IKE SA that
|
|
* it is currently trying to close, it SHOULD reply with TEMPORARY_FAILURE.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_single_notify(OUT, TEMPORARY_FAILURE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* RFC 7296, 2.25.2: If a peer receives a request to close an IKE SA that
|
|
* it is currently rekeying, it SHOULD reply as usual, and forget its own
|
|
* rekeying request.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(ike_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
assert_message_empty(OUT);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(TEMP_FAIL) } */
|
|
/* the SA is already gone */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
msg->destroy(msg);
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(ike_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* ike_rekey */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* One of the hosts initiates a DELETE of the IKE_SA the other peer is
|
|
* concurrently trying to rekey. However, the delete request is delayed or
|
|
* dropped, so the peer doing the rekeying is unaware of the collision.
|
|
*
|
|
* rekey ----\ /---- delete
|
|
* \-----/----> detect collision
|
|
* reschedule <---------/------ TEMP_FAIL
|
|
* <--------/
|
|
* delete ---------------->
|
|
*/
|
|
START_TEST(test_collision_delete_drop_delete)
|
|
{
|
|
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
|
message_t *msg;
|
|
status_t s;
|
|
|
|
if (_i)
|
|
{ /* responder rekeys the IKE_SA */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&b, &a, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{ /* initiator rekeys the IKE_SA */
|
|
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
|
&a, &b, NULL);
|
|
}
|
|
/* this should never get called as this does not result in a successful
|
|
* rekeying on either side */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_rekey);
|
|
|
|
initiate_rekey(a);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, delete, FALSE);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
|
|
/* RFC 7296, 2.25.2: If a peer receives a request to rekey an IKE SA that
|
|
* it is currently trying to close, it SHOULD reply with TEMPORARY_FAILURE.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Ni, KEi } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_single_notify(OUT, TEMPORARY_FAILURE);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(b, IKE_DELETING);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_count(0);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* delay the DELETE request */
|
|
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
|
|
|
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(TEMP_FAIL) } */
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(ike_updown);
|
|
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
|
/* we expect a job to retry the rekeying is scheduled */
|
|
assert_jobs_scheduled(1);
|
|
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
|
assert_ike_sa_state(a, IKE_ESTABLISHED);
|
|
assert_scheduler();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } (delayed) */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(ike_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
|
|
assert_message_empty(OUT);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, msg);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* INFORMATIONAL { } --> */
|
|
assert_hook_updown(ike_updown, FALSE);
|
|
assert_hook_updown(child_updown, FALSE);
|
|
s = exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
|
ck_assert_int_eq(DESTROY_ME, s);
|
|
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
|
|
/* ike_rekey */
|
|
assert_hook();
|
|
}
|
|
END_TEST
|
|
|
|
Suite *ike_rekey_suite_create()
|
|
{
|
|
Suite *s;
|
|
TCase *tc;
|
|
|
|
s = suite_create("ike rekey");
|
|
|
|
tc = tcase_create("regular");
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_regular, 0, 2);
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_regular_ke_invalid, 0, 2);
|
|
suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
|
|
|
|
tc = tcase_create("collisions rekey");
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision, 0, 4);
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_ke_invalid, 0, 4);
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_ke_invalid_delayed_retry, 0, 3);
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delayed_response, 0, 4);
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_dropped_request, 0, 3);
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delayed_request, 0, 3);
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delayed_request_and_delete, 0, 3);
|
|
suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
|
|
|
|
tc = tcase_create("collisions delete");
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delete, 0, 2);
|
|
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delete_drop_delete, 0, 2);
|
|
suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
|
|
|
|
return s;
|
|
}
|