unit-tests: Add tests where a peer is not aware of a CHILD_SA rekey collision
This commit is contained in:
@@ -254,7 +254,9 @@ START_TEST(test_collision)
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_del_a, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_del_b, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
@@ -268,7 +270,9 @@ START_TEST(test_collision)
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_del_b, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_del_a, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
@@ -304,6 +308,352 @@ START_TEST(test_collision)
|
||||
}
|
||||
END_TEST
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* This is like the rekey collision above, but one peer deletes the
|
||||
* redundant/old SA before the other peer receives the CREATE_CHILD_SA
|
||||
* response:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* rekey ----\ /---- rekey
|
||||
* \-----/----> detect collision
|
||||
* detect collision <---------/ /----
|
||||
* ----\ /
|
||||
* \----/----->
|
||||
* handle delete <--------/------- delete SA
|
||||
* --------/------->
|
||||
* handle rekey <------/
|
||||
* delete SA ---------------->
|
||||
* <----------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
START_TEST(test_collision_delayed_response)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
||||
message_t *msg;
|
||||
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
||||
&a, &b, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Four nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
||||
* CHILD_SA):
|
||||
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
||||
* \--/-----> N3/5
|
||||
* N4/6 <-------/ /----- ...
|
||||
* ... -----\
|
||||
* We test this four times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
||||
u_char nonces[4];
|
||||
/* SPIs of the deleted CHILD_SA (either redundant or replaced) */
|
||||
uint32_t spi_del_a, spi_del_b;
|
||||
/* SPIs of the kept CHILD_SA */
|
||||
uint32_t spi_a, spi_b;
|
||||
} data[] = {
|
||||
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 3, 2, 6, 4 },
|
||||
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 4, 3, 5 },
|
||||
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 3, 2, 6, 4 },
|
||||
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 1, 4, 3, 5 },
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
||||
initiate_rekey(a, 1);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
||||
initiate_rekey(b, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
/* this should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
||||
|
||||
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
||||
assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 2, 5);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[3];
|
||||
assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 1, 6);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 6, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
/* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA response from b to a */
|
||||
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
||||
|
||||
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } --> */
|
||||
if (data[_i].spi_del_b == 2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 2, data[_i].spi_b);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_del_b, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_del_a, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_b, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
if (data[_i].spi_del_b == 2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_a, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_del_a, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_b, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(b, 2);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } (delayed) */
|
||||
if (data[_i].spi_del_a == 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_a);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, msg);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, msg);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_del_a, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_a, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_b, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
||||
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_a, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* child_rekey/child_updown */
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
||||
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
END_TEST
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* In this scenario one of the peers does not notice that there is a
|
||||
* rekey collision:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* rekey ----\ /---- rekey
|
||||
* \ /
|
||||
* detect collision <-----\---/
|
||||
* -------\-------->
|
||||
* \ /---- delete old SA
|
||||
* \-/----> detect collision
|
||||
* detect collision <---------/ /---- TEMP_FAIL
|
||||
* delete -----------/---->
|
||||
* aborts rekeying <---------/
|
||||
*/
|
||||
START_TEST(test_collision_delayed_request)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
||||
message_t *msg;
|
||||
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
||||
&a, &b, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Three nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
||||
* CHILD_SA):
|
||||
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
||||
* N3/5 <-----\--/
|
||||
* ... -----\ \-------> ...
|
||||
* We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
||||
u_char nonces[3];
|
||||
} data[] = {
|
||||
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF } },
|
||||
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF } },
|
||||
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 } },
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
||||
initiate_rekey(a, 1);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
||||
initiate_rekey(b, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
/* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */
|
||||
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
||||
|
||||
/* this should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
||||
assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 1, 5);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } --> */
|
||||
assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 2, 4);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
|
||||
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> (delayed) */
|
||||
assert_single_notify(OUT, TEMPORARY_FAILURE);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, msg);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(TEMP_FAIL) } */
|
||||
assert_no_jobs_scheduled();
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
assert_scheduler();
|
||||
|
||||
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* child_rekey/child_updown */
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
assert_sa_idle(a);
|
||||
assert_sa_idle(b);
|
||||
|
||||
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
||||
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
END_TEST
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Similar to above one peer fails to notice the collision but the
|
||||
* CREATE_CHILD_SA request is even more delayed:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* rekey ----\ /---- rekey
|
||||
* \ /
|
||||
* detect collision <-----\---/
|
||||
* -------\-------->
|
||||
* detect collision <-------\-------- delete old SA
|
||||
* delete ---------\------>
|
||||
* \----->
|
||||
* /---- CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND
|
||||
* aborts rekeying <----------/
|
||||
*/
|
||||
START_TEST(test_collision_delayed_request_more)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ike_sa_t *a, *b;
|
||||
message_t *msg;
|
||||
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
|
||||
&a, &b, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Three nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
|
||||
* CHILD_SA):
|
||||
* N1/3 -----\ /----- N2/4
|
||||
* N3/5 <-----\--/
|
||||
* ... -----\ \-------> ...
|
||||
* We test this three times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
/* Nonces used at each point */
|
||||
u_char nonces[3];
|
||||
} data[] = {
|
||||
{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF } },
|
||||
{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF } },
|
||||
{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 } },
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
|
||||
initiate_rekey(a, 1);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
|
||||
initiate_rekey(b, 2);
|
||||
|
||||
/* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA request from a to b */
|
||||
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
||||
|
||||
/* this should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
|
||||
assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 1, 5);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_REKEYED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } --> */
|
||||
assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 2, 4);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_DELETING);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
|
||||
/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> */
|
||||
assert_single_notify(OUT, CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND);
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, msg);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(b, 4, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
|
||||
/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(NO_CHILD_SA) } */
|
||||
assert_no_jobs_scheduled();
|
||||
exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_state(a, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
|
||||
assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
|
||||
assert_scheduler();
|
||||
|
||||
/* child_rekey/child_updown */
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
assert_hook();
|
||||
|
||||
assert_sa_idle(a);
|
||||
assert_sa_idle(b);
|
||||
|
||||
call_ikesa(a, destroy);
|
||||
call_ikesa(b, destroy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
END_TEST
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Both peers initiate the CHILD_SA reekying concurrently but the proposed DH
|
||||
* groups are not the same after handling the INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD they should
|
||||
@@ -673,7 +1023,7 @@ END_TEST
|
||||
* either side */
|
||||
assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
|
||||
|
||||
/* delay the CREAE_CHILD_SA request */
|
||||
/* delay the CREATE_CHILD_SA request */
|
||||
msg = exchange_test_helper->sender->dequeue(exchange_test_helper->sender);
|
||||
|
||||
/* RFC 7296, 2.25.1: If a peer receives a request to delete a CHILD_SA that
|
||||
@@ -761,6 +1111,9 @@ Suite *child_rekey_suite_create()
|
||||
|
||||
tc = tcase_create("collisions rekey");
|
||||
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision, 0, 4);
|
||||
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delayed_response, 0, 4);
|
||||
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delayed_request, 0, 3);
|
||||
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_delayed_request_more, 0, 3);
|
||||
tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_ke_invalid, 0, 4);
|
||||
suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user