Be a little more verbose why a peer_cfg is inacceptable
This commit is contained in:
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static bool update_cfg_candidates(private_ike_auth_t *this, bool strict)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (this->peer_cfg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool complies = TRUE;
|
||||
char *comply_error = NULL;
|
||||
enumerator_t *e1, *e2, *tmp;
|
||||
auth_cfg_t *c1, *c2;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -336,22 +336,30 @@ static bool update_cfg_candidates(private_ike_auth_t *this, bool strict)
|
||||
while (e1->enumerate(e1, &c1))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* check if done authentications comply to configured ones */
|
||||
if ((!e2->enumerate(e2, &c2)) ||
|
||||
(!strict && !c1->complies(c1, c2, TRUE)) ||
|
||||
(strict && !c2->complies(c2, c1, TRUE)))
|
||||
if (!e2->enumerate(e2, &c2))
|
||||
{
|
||||
complies = FALSE;
|
||||
comply_error = "insufficient authentication rounds";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!strict && !c1->complies(c1, c2, TRUE))
|
||||
{
|
||||
comply_error = "non-matching authentication done";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (strict && !c2->complies(c2, c1, TRUE))
|
||||
{
|
||||
comply_error = "constraint checking failed";
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
e1->destroy(e1);
|
||||
e2->destroy(e2);
|
||||
if (complies)
|
||||
if (!comply_error)
|
||||
{
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
DBG1(DBG_CFG, "selected peer config '%s' inacceptable",
|
||||
this->peer_cfg->get_name(this->peer_cfg));
|
||||
DBG1(DBG_CFG, "selected peer config '%s' inacceptable: %s",
|
||||
this->peer_cfg->get_name(this->peer_cfg), comply_error);
|
||||
this->peer_cfg->destroy(this->peer_cfg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (this->candidates->remove_first(this->candidates,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user