unit-tests: Test for rekeying if INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD notifies are received

2016-06-17 18:48:03 +02:00
parent 5ef033c53b
commit f97bac5594
1 changed files with 253 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -96,6 +96,94 @@ START_TEST(test_regular)
 }
 END_TEST

+/**
+ * CHILD_SA rekey where the responder does not agree with the DH group selected
+ * by the initiator, either initiated by the original initiator or responder of
+ * the IKE_SA.
+ */
+START_TEST(test_regular_ke_invalid)
+{
+	exchange_test_sa_conf_t conf = {
+		.initiator = {
+			.esp = "aes128-sha256-modp2048-modp3072",
+		},
+		.responder = {
+			.esp = "aes128-sha256-modp3072-modp2048",
+		},
+	};
+	ike_sa_t *a, *b;
+	uint32_t spi_a = _i+1, spi_b = 2-_i;
+
+	if (_i)
+	{	/* responder rekeys the CHILD_SA (SPI 2) */
+		exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
+										   &b, &a, &conf);
+	}
+	else
+	{	/* initiator rekeys the CHILD_SA (SPI 1) */
+		exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
+										   &a, &b, &conf);
+	}
+	initiate_rekey(a, spi_a);
+
+	/* this should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
+
+	/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	assert_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, spi_b, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
+	assert_hook();
+
+	/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(INVAL_KE) } */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	assert_single_notify(IN, INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, spi_a, CHILD_REKEYING);
+	assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
+	assert_hook();
+
+	/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> */
+	assert_hook_called(child_rekey);
+	assert_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, spi_b, CHILD_REKEYED);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, 6, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_hook();
+
+	/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } */
+	assert_hook_called(child_rekey);
+	assert_no_notify(IN, REKEY_SA);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, spi_a, CHILD_DELETING);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_hook();
+
+	/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, 6, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
+	assert_hook();
+	/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	assert_single_payload(IN, PLV2_DELETE);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, 5, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
+	assert_hook();
+
+	/* child_updown */
+	assert_hook();
+
+	call_ikesa(a, destroy);
+	call_ikesa(b, destroy);
+}
+END_TEST
+
 /**
 * Both peers initiate the CHILD_SA reekying concurrently and should handle
 * the collision properly depending on the nonces.
@@ -216,6 +304,169 @@ START_TEST(test_collision)
 }
 END_TEST

+/**
+ * Both peers initiate the CHILD_SA reekying concurrently but the proposed DH
+ * groups are not the same after handling the INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD they should
+ * still handle the collision properly depending on the nonces.
+ */
+START_TEST(test_collision_ke_invalid)
+{
+	exchange_test_sa_conf_t conf = {
+		.initiator = {
+			.esp = "aes128-sha256-modp2048-modp3072",
+		},
+		.responder = {
+			.esp = "aes128-sha256-modp3072-modp2048",
+		},
+	};
+	ike_sa_t *a, *b;
+
+	exchange_test_helper->establish_sa(exchange_test_helper,
+									   &a, &b, &conf);
+
+	/* Eight nonces and SPIs are needed (SPI 1 and 2 are used for the initial
+	 * CHILD_SA):
+	 *     N1/3 -----\    /----- N2/4
+	 *                \--/-----> N3/5
+	 *     N4/6 <-------/  /---- INVAL_KE
+	 * INVAL_KE -----\    /
+	 *          <-----\--/
+	 *     N5/7 -----\ \------->
+	 *                \    /---- N6/8
+	 *                 \--/----> N7/9
+	 *    N8/10 <--------/ /---- ...
+	 *      ... ------\
+	 *
+	 * We test this four times, each time a different nonce is the lowest.
+	 */
+	struct {
+		/* Nonces used at each point */
+		u_char nonces[4];
+		/* SPIs of the deleted CHILD_SA (either redundant or replaced) */
+		uint32_t spi_del_a, spi_del_b;
+		/* SPIs of the kept CHILD_SA */
+		uint32_t spi_a, spi_b;
+	} data[] = {
+		{ { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 7, 2,10, 8 },
+		{ { 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF, 0xFF }, 1, 8, 7, 9 },
+		{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00, 0xFF }, 7, 2,10, 8 },
+		{ { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00 }, 1, 8, 7, 9 },
+	};
+
+	initiate_rekey(a, 1);
+	initiate_rekey(b, 2);
+
+	/* this should never get called as this results in a successful rekeying */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_updown);
+
+	/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_REKEYING);
+	assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
+	assert_hook();
+	/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_REKEYING);
+	assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
+	assert_hook();
+
+	/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(INVAL_KE) } */
+	exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[0];
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	assert_single_notify(IN, INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_REKEYING);
+	assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
+	assert_hook();
+	/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(INVAL_KE) } --> */
+	exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[1];
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	assert_single_notify(IN, INVALID_KE_PAYLOAD);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_REKEYING);
+	assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
+	assert_hook();
+
+	/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } --> */
+	exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[2];
+	assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 2, 9);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, 2, CHILD_REKEYED);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, 9, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_hook();
+	/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { N(REKEY_SA), SA, Ni, [KEi,] TSi, TSr } */
+	exchange_test_helper->nonce_first_byte = data[_i].nonces[3];
+	assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 1, 10);
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, 1, CHILD_REKEYED);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a,10, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_hook();
+
+	/* <-- CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } */
+	if (data[_i].spi_del_a == 1)
+	{	/* currently we call this again if we keep our own replacement as we
+		 * already called it above */
+		assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 1, data[_i].spi_a);
+		exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+		assert_hook();
+	}
+	else
+	{
+		exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	}
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_del_a, CHILD_DELETING);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_del_b, CHILD_REKEYED);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_a, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	/* CREATE_CHILD_SA { SA, Nr, [KEr,] TSi, TSr } --> */
+	if (data[_i].spi_del_b == 2)
+	{
+		assert_hook_rekey(child_rekey, 2, data[_i].spi_b);
+		exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+		assert_hook();
+	}
+	else
+	{
+		exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	}
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_del_b, CHILD_DELETING);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_del_a, CHILD_REKEYED);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_b, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+
+	/* we don't expect this hook to get called anymore */
+	assert_hook_not_called(child_rekey);
+	/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_del_b, CHILD_DELETING);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_b, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_child_sa_count(b, 2);
+	/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_del_a, CHILD_DELETING);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_a, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_child_sa_count(a, 2);
+	/* <-- INFORMATIONAL { D } */
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, a, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(a, data[_i].spi_a, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_child_sa_count(a, 1);
+	/* INFORMATIONAL { D } --> */
+	exchange_test_helper->process_message(exchange_test_helper, b, NULL);
+	assert_child_sa_state(b, data[_i].spi_b, CHILD_INSTALLED);
+	assert_child_sa_count(b, 1);
+
+	/* child_rekey/child_updown */
+	assert_hook();
+	assert_hook();
+
+	assert_sa_idle(a);
+	assert_sa_idle(b);
+
+	call_ikesa(a, destroy);
+	call_ikesa(b, destroy);
+}
+END_TEST
+
 /**
 * One of the hosts initiates a DELETE of the CHILD_SA the other peer is
 * concurrently trying to rekey.
@@ -505,10 +756,12 @@ Suite *child_rekey_suite_create()

 	tc = tcase_create("regular");
 	tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_regular, 0, 2);
+	tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_regular_ke_invalid, 0, 2);
 	suite_add_tcase(s, tc);

 	tc = tcase_create("collisions rekey");
 	tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision, 0, 4);
+	tcase_add_loop_test(tc, test_collision_ke_invalid, 0, 4);
 	suite_add_tcase(s, tc);

 	tc = tcase_create("collisions delete");